obnoxion wrote:
Here I see two of the most important aspects of spiritual Satanism connected in one sacred place: 1) The profound holiness of the Soil, 2) the deep reverence of Death.
In regard to the Sedlec Ossuary, which was the first place discussed in this context, I have been lucky enough to have experienced it.
Unfortunately, the suspicions of it being overridden with tourism is true, but this did not however overpower its importance and beauty. The juxtaposition of such an array of flaccid form in the setting of such a place almost made the reverence of Death that much more powerful, but it may have distracted and thus limited the experience.
However, I have been party to far deeper, intrinsic and overwhelming experiences at a place no more than 10 miles from my own home, that is called 'Stoney Littleton'. It is merely an excavated neolithic long barrow/chambered tomb, but the walk there feels as much of a pilgrimage as if I were to travel across borders and the reverence of Death felt there is incredibly special, despite the fact that any literal representation of it (bones) no longer remain insitu.
Upon entering it, a different 'world' is felt, and regardless of the weather and temperature outside, it is immediately freezing and full of intensely dry air inside.
As Fra Nefastos expressed far better than I can, I think ones GeoChakra is only bound/centred to the place that ones Chakra is focused on at any given time. I do not therefore think that one of the above is any more important than the other, or that I (in any way) am drawn to either one more than the other. They were both erected solely as a celebration of Death, so are both therefore Holy.
Rhetorically speaking, what therefore impacts on the difference in experience from one place to another when all are as equally Holy and reverential to Death as the other?
The most obvious would be the external factors imposed upon it, such as the amount/type of other people and environment surrounding it, but our realisation of and thus search for freedom from Maya and Samsara should be internal and thus universal, so not bound to or affected by surroundings.